<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>"Scott's Brain"</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottgammans.com/blog/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog</link>
	<description>random doodles from a middle-aged trekkie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Excitement in da hood!</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/03/01/excitement-in-da-hood/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/03/01/excitement-in-da-hood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Meatspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excitement in da hood! Cops have blocked off all the streets leading into my neighborhood, looking for a burglary suspect on the loose! This po-po is stationed at the entrance to our subdivision right across the street from my front door.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excitement in da hood! Cops have blocked off all the streets leading into my neighborhood, looking for a burglary suspect on the loose! This po-po is stationed at the entrance to our subdivision right across the street from my front door.</p>
<div id="attachment_289" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 463px"><img class="size-full wp-image-289" title="Loudoun County's Finest" src="http://scottgammans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/23924_1389702306570_1352473943_1075252_1722493_n.jpg" alt="Loudoun County's Finest" width="453" height="604" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Loudoun County&#39;s Finest</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/03/01/excitement-in-da-hood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phaser Test &#8211; Stardate 2010.0217</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/02/17/phaser-test-stardate-2010-0217/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/02/17/phaser-test-stardate-2010-0217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planet Killer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an animatic test of the phaser fire effect I whipped up for Decker&#8217;s attack on the planet killer.

And you thought I wasn&#8217;t working on this project. Tsk tsk tsk.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an animatic test of the phaser fire effect I whipped up for Decker&#8217;s attack on the planet killer.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="660" height="525" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ufclp5CBxHI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="660" height="525" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ufclp5CBxHI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;border=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>And you thought I wasn&#8217;t working on this project. Tsk tsk tsk.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scottgammans.com/doomsdaymachine/deckers_revenge.jpg"></a></p>
<div id="attachment_282" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.scottgammans.com/doomsdaymachine/deckers_revenge.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-282" title="Decker's Revenge" src="http://scottgammans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/deckers_revenge-300x187.jpg" alt="Decker's Revenge" width="300" height="187" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Decker&#39;s Revenge</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/02/17/phaser-test-stardate-2010-0217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost Lunar Dreams</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/02/02/lost-lunar-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/02/02/lost-lunar-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Exploration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems only fitting on the day that President Obama&#8217;s proposed 2011 budget officially killed NASA&#8217;s Constellation program to return to the Moon that I post a link to a website I discovered today:
Beyond Apollo—Plans for the Exploration of Space from the Age of Apollo, 1959-1979
I&#8217;d always considered myself to be something of a space [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems only fitting on the day that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/01/AR2010020102145.html" target="_blank">President Obama&#8217;s proposed 2011 budget officially killed NASA&#8217;s Constellation program to return to the Moon</a> that I post a link to a website I discovered today<a href="http://beyondapollo.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">:</a></p>
<p><a href="http://beyondapollo.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Beyond Apollo—Plans for the Exploration of Space from the Age of Apollo, 1959-1979</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d always considered myself to be something of a space buff in general and NASA fanboy in particular—my best friend is a former mid-level executive at NASA and I myself used to work for a NASA subcontractor years ago—but I just finished the better part of this evening reading article after fascinating article at David Portree&#8217;s website on missions and space vehicles that I had never even heard <em><strong>rumors</strong></em> of before. (Did you know that at one point there were plans to soft-land spent Saturn S-IVB stages on the lunar surface for use as shelters instead of smacking them into the Moon? Or that as late as 1967 NASA was planning manned flyby missions of Venus and Mars after the Moon landings as a logical next step towards a manned Mars landing mission in the early 1980s?)</p>
<p>David Portree&#8217;s blog is a must-bookmark site for diehard space geeks and promises endless hours of fascinating (and depressing) reading, and interestingly enough, has helped me put Obama&#8217;s NASA budget cuts into stark perspective. When you step back for a second and consider the scope of audacious proposals like the <a href="http://beyondapollo.blogspot.com/2009/09/nerva-electric-mars-ship-1966.html" target="_blank">NERVA Electric Mars Ship</a> (see below) and compare those big-thinking plans to the relatively puny ambitions of the anemically underfunded Constellation program, it really makes you stop and realize something: we didn&#8217;t lose the Moon today. We lost it over forty years ago.</p>
<div id="attachment_278" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 331px"><img class="size-full wp-image-278" title="AT07i2" src="http://scottgammans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/AT07i2.jpg" alt="NERVA Electric Mars Probe (1966)" width="321" height="500" /><p class="wp-caption-text">NERVA Electric Mars Probe (1966)</p></div>
<p>How did we get to this point? How did our dreams become so small and timid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/02/02/lost-lunar-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Enterprise at the National Air and Space Museum</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/31/the-enterprise-at-the-national-air-space-museum/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/31/the-enterprise-at-the-national-air-space-museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smithsonian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure everyone visiting this blog has seen this image before, but it&#8217;s new to me and in my considered opinion you can never have too many images of the Enterprise lying around.


What&#8217;s really unusual about this particular image of the 11&#8242; studio model of the Enterprise is that it&#8217;s taken from an angle that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure everyone visiting this blog has seen this image before, but it&#8217;s new to me and in my considered opinion you can never have too many images of the <em>Enterprise</em> lying around.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/webimages/highres/2005-34607h.jpg" target="_blank"><div id="attachment_272" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 453px"><img class="size-full wp-image-272" title="2005-34607h" src="http://scottgammans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/2005-34607h.jpg" alt="Starship Enterprise 1960s studio model at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum" width="443" height="396" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Starship Enterprise 1960s studio model at Smithsonian Air and Space Museum</p></div></a><br />
<span id="more-271"></span><br />
What&#8217;s really unusual about this particular image of the 11&#8242; studio model of the <em>Enterprise</em> is that it&#8217;s taken from an angle that normally can&#8217;t be seen. Anyone who&#8217;s made the pilgrimage to NASM in Washington, DC knows what I&#8217;m talking about; ever since the studio miniature was refurbished by Ed Miarecki in 1991 and moved into the basement gift shop, it&#8217;s been displayed in an eye-level glass case. Great for seeing the model up close, not so great for taking pictures of the model from below.</p>
<p>So&#8230; I wonder how this picture was taken? I am fairly certain that the image has been edited somewhat to hide the background; <a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/collections/artifact.cfm?id=A19740668000" target="_blank">here is what appears to be the original</a>. Obviously the <em>Enterprise</em> model is suspended from the ceiling above, but the refurbished model (AFAIK) has never been displayed in public like this. Is this a photo taken right after the restoration at the facility where the work was done? If anyone has any clues about the story behind this photo, please post a comment below. Meanwhile, click the link below to view the original full-size version of this image at the NASM website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/webimages/highres/2005-34607h.jpg" target="_blank">1960&#8217;s Starship <em>Enterprise</em> Studio Model at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum</a></p>
<p>By the way (and in case anyone&#8217;s wondering), I&#8217;ve been taking a couple of weeks off from my &#8220;Doomsday Machine&#8221; project to recharge my batteries, but I&#8217;ve resumed work and hopefully will have more progress to show in February. It&#8217;s hard being a one-man show&#8230; sometimes ya gotta take a break to get the creative juices flowing again! Thanks for your patience. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/31/the-enterprise-at-the-national-air-space-museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hangar deck and shuttlecraft &#8211; part 2</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/07/hangar-deck-and-shuttlecraft-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/07/hangar-deck-and-shuttlecraft-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hangar Deck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shuttlecraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another angle on the Jefferies (click to embiggen).

I figured out the problems I was having with radiosity—no more splotches. :) Still no major texturing changes here; just some noodling with saturation and contrast levels. From this angle I can also see where I need to add more visual interest to the hangar deck model, either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another angle on the <em>Jefferies</em> (click to embiggen).</p>
<p>
<a href='http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/07/hangar-deck-and-shuttlecraft-part-2/hangar_1280x960-2/' title='hangar_1280x960'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://scottgammans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/hangar_1280x9601-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="hangar_1280x960" /></a>
<br />
<span id="more-265"></span><br />
I figured out the problems I was having with radiosity—no more splotches. :) Still no major texturing changes here; just some noodling with saturation and contrast levels. From this angle I can also see where I need to add more visual interest to the hangar deck model, either with texturing, physical details or both. The CGI model is a pretty faithful recreation of the physical hangar deck model built in 1966-67 for the original series episode &#8220;The Galileo Seven&#8221;, but that means it&#8217;s also kinda bland and plastic-looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/07/hangar-deck-and-shuttlecraft-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hangar deck and shuttlecraft</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/06/hangar-deck-and-shuttlecraft/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/06/hangar-deck-and-shuttlecraft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hangar Deck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shuttlecraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been a little motivationally-challenged for a few days now, so I&#8217;m taking a little break to work on something that&#8217;s going to have to be tackled anyway when I get to act III. Here&#8217;s an amuse bouche for you.

I haven&#8217;t touched the Jefferies or the hangar deck models since I finished them way back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a little motivationally-challenged for a few days now, so I&#8217;m taking a little break to work on something that&#8217;s going to have to be tackled anyway when I get to act III. Here&#8217;s an <em>amuse bouche</em> for you.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 650px"><img title="Unmodified hangar and shuttle models from Summer 2007" src="http://www.scottgammans.com/doomsdaymachine/hangar_640x480.jpg" alt="Unmodified hangar and shuttle models from Summer 2007" width="640" height="480" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Unmodified hangar and shuttle models from Summer 2007</p></div>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align: left;">
<p>I haven&#8217;t touched the <em>Jefferies </em>or the hangar deck models since I finished them way back in the Summer of 2007, and they still need texture and lighting tweaks (especially the lighting—there are some bad radiosity artifacts right now). This is a raw image with no modifications to the models or the 2007 lighting setup, so consider this a starting point.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2010/01/06/hangar-deck-and-shuttlecraft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Act II Scene 2 complete!</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/act-ii-scene-2-complete/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/act-ii-scene-2-complete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planet Killer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, that&#8217;s better! I fixed the angle that the planet killer flies past the camera so that the viewer can now more clearly see the four component lances of the antiproton beam coalescing together, and I composited in the missing asteroid field and volumetric space dust layers that were missing from the previous test video.

I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that&#8217;s better! I fixed the angle that the planet killer flies past the camera so that the viewer can now more clearly see the four component lances of the antiproton beam coalescing together, and I composited in the missing asteroid field and volumetric space dust layers that were missing from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhPjam4MUeY">the previous test video</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_254" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 650px"><img class="size-full wp-image-254" title="This will not end well" src="http://scottgammans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/act2_scene02.jpg" alt="This will not end well" width="640" height="480" /><p class="wp-caption-text">This will not end well</p></div>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="660" height="525" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pip4T2s2mWE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="660" height="525" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pip4T2s2mWE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;border=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>I probably could spend another week or two endlessly tweaking this 66-frame sequence, but I think this is the best it&#8217;s going to get. It&#8217;s a shame, because there are a few things that have always bothered me about this particular sequence&#8230; more after the jump.<br />
<span id="more-248"></span><br />
Mkay, so first, it was a dumbass move for Kirk to order the shields lowered while the <em>Enterprise</em> was in the line of fire of a leviathan that fires antiproton beams to slice up planets. My initial thought for fixing this was to somehow re-edit the sequence to excise Kirk making such a boneheaded mistake, but it basically would have meant cutting to the attack sequence immediately after Spock says &#8220;I also believe the nature of this machine precludes the possiblity of easy access to its control mechanisms&#8221; as a communicator voice-over while the camera is on the <em>Constellation</em>. I gave it a test try, but the transition was just too jarring and abrupt. So, our brave captain stays a dum-dum for this one.</p>
<p>My next objection was a little less straightforward but bothered me even more: When the <em>Enterprise</em> was struck by the antiproton beam the first time with shields down, everyone onboard got tossed to starboard and the ship careened out of control. Yet a few minutes later (after Decker&#8217;s disastrous strafing run on the planet killer when deflector shields are damaged and gone for good), the planet killer fired three more times on the <em>Enterprise</em>&#8230; and it didn&#8217;t seem like a big deal at all! All that seemed to happen was the ship shuddered, the warp drive went offline, some <em>Enterprise</em> crewmembers were injured or possibly killed, and some hull ruptures occured (the latter three all occurred off-camera). But no one got tossed to the deck, and the <em>Enterprise</em> stayed pretty much in level flight. Maybe she stayed stable because she was caught in a tractor beam, but that presents another problem: she was probably CLOSER to the planet killer for those last three shots!</p>
<p>To fix these glaring inconsistencies, I storyboarded an initial attack sequence where the <em>Enterprise</em> (which was flying like an F-18 desperately trying to evade the doomsday machine) dived behind a largish asteroid just as the planet killer fired its antiproton beam. The beam would strike the asteroid instead of the <em>Enterprise</em>&#8211;protecting the ship from direct damage by the beam&#8211;but the mega<em><strong>BOOM!!</strong></em> explosion of the asteroid would cause the ship to ricochet off-course and toss our gallant crewmembers out of their safety-beltless chairs. My thought here would be that this would explain why the Enterprise didn&#8217;t suffer the extreme damage she suffered later on in Act II, and it would also explain why she spun out of control (because of the shock wave from the exploding asteroid). Yeah yeah, shock waves don&#8217;t travel through the vacuum of space. Well, warp drive&#8217;s impossible too, so :p</p>
<p>Unfortunately, no matter how I timed it out I kept bumping up against some hard limits storytelling-wise. Because I have to cleave to the original soundtrack, I only had 66 frames for this shot and I just couldn&#8217;t figure out a way to squeeze all that visual information into less than three seconds. I suppose if I was more proficient with sound editing I might have been able to stretch out the soundtrack (perhaps by repeating some of the beats) so that I&#8217;d have more time to show everything, but I just couldn&#8217;t justify spending all that time for what was originally 2.75 seconds of film. In the end, I felt it was more important to have the camera concentrate its attention on the first glimpse of the planet killer&#8217;s main weapon being fired&#8230; the interior shot of the <em>Enterprise </em>crew getting tossed out of their chairs was enough of a clue to the audience that some bad juju was going down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/act-ii-scene-2-complete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SpockBoy Weighs In</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/spockboy-weighs-in/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/spockboy-weighs-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpockBoy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My buddy Paul Sibbald&#8211;whom many of you may know by his nom de plume SpockBoy&#8211;has taken the time to compile the following video critique of some of the visual effects I&#8217;ve posted thus far:

Scott Suggestion from spockboy on Vimeo.
Some of the visuals he&#8217;s commented upon are from the aborted March 2008 effort, but many of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My buddy Paul Sibbald&#8211;whom many of you may know by his <em>nom de plume</em> <a title="SpockBoy at YouTube" href="http://www.youtube.com/spockboy" target="_blank"><strong>SpockBoy</strong></a>&#8211;has taken the time to compile the following video critique of some of the visual effects I&#8217;ve posted thus far:</p>
<p><object width="400" height="225"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8447473&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=01AAEA&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8447473&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=01AAEA&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="225"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/8447473">Scott Suggestion</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user947805">spockboy</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>Some of the visuals he&#8217;s commented upon are from the aborted March 2008 effort, but many of them are not. In any event, I am immensely flattered that Paul has gone to this depth of effort to analyze and offer constructive criticism of my work, and I place a great deal of value in what he&#8217;s got to say. Paul just recently started film school (attaboy, SpockBoy!) and anyone who&#8217;s seen his immensely creative mashups at <a title="SpockBoy at LiveVideo" href="http://www.livevideo.com/user/videos.aspx?uid=7FB7F803D4E54BAB899B45214FC4D09B" target="_blank">LiveVideo</a> and <a title="SpockBoy at YouTube" href="http://www.youtube.com/spockboy" target="_blank">YouTube</a> know that he&#8217;s got a keen eye for all things <em>Trek</em>. He&#8217;s definitely given me a banquet&#8217;s worth of food for thought, and I&#8217;d also be very interested in hearing comments from the peanut gallery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/spockboy-weighs-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pill or Star Trek Character?</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/pill-or-star-trek-character/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/pill-or-star-trek-character/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy holidays everyone! I hope your winter holiday (or summer for my friends south of the equator) has been as enjoyable and stress-free as mine. So! While waiting for scene #2 in Act II to finish rendering I took the Star Trek Character or Erectile Dysfunction Pill Quiz at mentalfloss.com. (How&#8217;s that for a seamless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy holidays everyone! I hope your winter holiday (or summer for my friends south of the equator) has been as enjoyable and stress-free as mine. So! While waiting for scene #2 in Act II to finish rendering I took the <a title="Star Trek Character or Erectile Dysfunction Pill Quiz" href="http://mentalfloss.com/quiz/quiz.php?q=599" target="_blank"><em>Star Trek</em> Character or Erectile Dysfunction Pill Quiz</a> at mentalfloss.com. (How&#8217;s <strong>that</strong> for a seamless segue?)<br />

<a href='http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/pill-or-star-trek-character/pill_test-2/' title='Unlike the potions in this quiz, all you need to do here is click to embiggen'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://scottgammans.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/pill_test1-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="Unlike the potions in this quiz, all you need to do here is click to embiggen" /></a>
<br />
Oh well, at least I beat the average of 52%, but 70% is a poor showing for a Trekkie. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/29/pill-or-star-trek-character/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 3 of 8 Test is now online!</title>
		<link>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/22/part-3-of-8-test-is-now-online/</link>
		<comments>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/22/part-3-of-8-test-is-now-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gammans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planet Killer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottgammans.com/blog/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 3 of 8 is now online&#8211;sort of. Let me explain, after the jump.


What you&#8217;re viewing in this clip is an assembly of visual effects footage in various states of completion. The opener to Act II with the Enterprise sailing through the debris field is complete but for a planned re-rendering of the planet killer&#8211;I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part 3 of 8 is now online&#8211;sort of. Let me explain, after the jump.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="505" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GhPjam4MUeY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="505" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GhPjam4MUeY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<span id="more-229"></span><br />
What you&#8217;re viewing in this clip is an assembly of visual effects footage in various states of completion. The opener to Act II with the <em>Enterprise</em> sailing through the debris field is complete but for a planned re-rendering of the planet killer&#8211;I tweaked the model&#8217;s textures after I released test footage last month, and now it doesn&#8217;t match the appearance of the Doomsday Machine in the following scene. Speaking of which&#8230; the next sequence where the planet killer cuts loose on the Enterprise is semi-complete; there are about 20,000 more asteroids and the glowy blue dust cloud that still need to be added, and I may re-render the planet killer itself to give a better angle on the antiproton beam effect (right now, it&#8217;s kind of hard to see all four of the beams that lance together into one unified antiproton beam).</p>
<p>The rest of the visual effects from that point forward are actually old shots from my March 2008 attempt to complete this episode. I haven&#8217;t shown this footage to hardly anyone until today, so I hope it&#8217;s of interest for&#8211;if nothing else&#8211;comparison purposes with the visual effects that will eventually replace them in 2010.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be online sporadically until after the new year, but I welcome your comments in the meantime&#8211;I promise I&#8217;ll try to respond as soon as possible. Meanwhile, Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas, Blessed Kwanza, Festive Festivus and Happy New Year, everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottgammans.com/blog/2009/12/22/part-3-of-8-test-is-now-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.700 seconds -->
